diiirect
PlatformTalentDataPricingFuture of work
Sign inPost a role

Explore

  • Platform
  • Talent
  • Data
  • Pricing
  • Future of work
Sign in

Get started

Hire talentI'm looking for work

First shortlist in 5 days

diiirect

Hiring, but direct. A platform and talent marketplace where companies, recruiters, and skilled professionals work together to move from role brief to qualified shortlist faster.

Product

  • Platform
  • Intelligence
  • Categories
  • Talent
  • Pricing
  • Changelog
  • Roadmap

Who it's for

  • For talent
  • For companies
  • For recruiters
  • For non-profits
  • Compare all four

Company

  • Manifesto
  • Case studies
  • Contact
  • Book a demo
  • Press & Media
  • Investors
  • Partners

Resources

  • Templates
  • Assessments
  • Experts
  • Nominate an Expert
  • FAQ
  • Hackathons
  • Apply as talent
  • Start hiring
  • Blog

Tools

  • All tools
  • EOR calculator
  • Resume generator

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Data deletion

Categories

  • Software & Web
  • Data & AI/ML
  • DevOps & Cloud
  • Cybersecurity
  • Blockchain & Web3
  • All categories

By tool

  • HubSpot

Alternative to

  • Upwork
  • Toptal
  • Fiverr
  • Freelancer
  • Guru
Made withπŸ§‰inπŸ‡¦πŸ‡·πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈbyDraidel
Template library

Templates for every step of hiring and working

Home/Templates/Interviewing/Working session interview guide
Template & guide

Working session interview guide

How to run a pair-working interview: task selection rules, setup, a facilitation script with calibrated hints, and an evaluation rubric focused on collaboration under ambiguity.

  • Made forEmployers Β· Recruiters
  • Reading time~3 min
  • What's includedA complete, professionally written document you can adapt to your team.
Sign up to customize & send

The template

A working session answers the one question no interview format answers well: what is it actually like to work with this person? For 60–90 minutes, the candidate and one interviewer work a realistic task together β€” thinking aloud, trading ideas, hitting a snag and getting past it. Run well, it is the highest-signal stage in a loop. Run badly, it is a performance exam with an audience, which measures stage nerves.

Choosing the task

  • Realistic but self-contained: drawn from the kind of work {{Role title}} actually does, stripped of internal context a newcomer could not have. Ten minutes of context-setting maximum.
  • Never live work: using a current business problem is free consulting and candidates can tell. It also makes evaluation incomparable across candidates.
  • Sized for two-thirds of the slot: a strong candidate should reach a meaningful milestone with time to spare. Completion is not the goal; the collaboration is.
  • Deliberately underspecified in one dimension β€” a missing requirement, an ambiguous constraint β€” so you can watch how they surface and resolve ambiguity.
  • The same task for every candidate in the search, with the same prepared hints.

Setup

  • Send logistics in advance: format, duration, tools, and what will be evaluated. Surprise is not signal.
  • Let candidates use their normal environment and tools where practical β€” familiar setup measures ability, unfamiliar setup measures adaptation to your setup.
  • Prepare a written hint ladder: three escalating hints for each place candidates typically get stuck. Scripted hints keep help consistent; improvised help varies with how much the interviewer likes the candidate.

Facilitating β€” you are a colleague, not a judge

  1. Open (5 min): Frame it honestly β€” we'll work on this together; ask me anything; I care about how we work, not whether we finish.
  2. Context (10 min): Present the task, answer questions. Note which questions they ask β€” scoping questions are early signal.
  3. Work (40–60 min): Behave like a good teammate: answer questions directly, offer opinions when asked, push back once on one of their choices to see what they do with disagreement. Give hints from the ladder when stuck-time stops producing information β€” watching someone flounder for fifteen minutes teaches you nothing new after the third.
  4. Wrap (10 min): Ask: where would you take this next, what would you do differently, how confident are you in what we built?

Evaluation rubric

DimensionStrong (3–4)Weak (1–2)ScoreEvidence
Handling ambiguityNoticed the underspecified dimension, asked or named an explicit assumption.Built silently on an unexamined assumption; surprised by it late.{{Score}}{{Notes}}
CollaborationThought aloud, invited input, built on your suggestions; disagreed by engaging your reasoning.Worked in silence, ignored input, or folded instantly on pushback.{{Score}}{{Notes}}
Quality of core workSound approach for the level; work a teammate could pick up and continue.Approach a peer would have to redo; no self-checking.{{Score}}{{Notes}}
Use of helpAbsorbed hints quickly and built on them; asked well-formed questions.Needed the full hint ladder and still could not use it, or refused all help on principle.{{Score}}{{Notes}}
PrioritizationWent for the highest-value part first; cut scope out loud.Polished trivia while the core sat untouched.{{Score}}{{Notes}}

Scoring cautions

  • Score against the hint ladder record: a candidate who used two hints and collaborated brilliantly can outscore one who needed none and worked like a sealed box.
  • Nerves in the first fifteen minutes are noise. Weight the back half of the session, once the person has settled into the work.
  • Do not reward speed for its own sake β€” the session simulates a workday, not a game show.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws differ by jurisdiction and change over time β€” have a qualified professional review any document before you rely on it.

Related templates

Template & guide

Account Executive interview questions

30 vetted interview questions for an Account Executive, grouped by competency β€” discovery, pipeline, demos and value selling, negotiation, forecasting, and coachability β€” with what-good-looks-like guidance.

Employers Β· Recruiters
Template & guide

Backend Engineer interview questions

Thirty vetted interview questions for Backend Engineer candidates covering API design, data modeling, performance, reliability, and collaboration, with strong-answer guidance.

Employers Β· Recruiters
Template & guide

Behavioral interview scorecard

A competency-based rubric for behavioral rounds: five competencies with calibrated anchors, past-behavior evidence rules, and a no-averaging recommendation section.

Employers Β· Recruiters
Template & guide

Brand Designer interview questions

Twenty-eight vetted interview questions for Brand Designer candidates covering brand strategy, identity craft, systems, collaboration, and feedback, with strong-answer guidance.

Employers Β· Recruiters
Template & guide

Candidate evaluation rubric

A cross-stage evaluation matrix that combines individual scorecards into one weighted decision view, with rules for setting weights before interviews and handling gaps and vetoes.

Employers Β· Recruiters
Template & guide

Candidate experience checklist

A touchpoint-by-touchpoint checklist that keeps candidates informed and respected from application to decision, with response-time standards and the failures that cost offers.

Employers Β· Recruiters